Studio 10 backs #morelogiewomen campaign

7 Responses

1. Surely it devalues it if you open it up to three entrants a year, and actually more than anything surely puts a huge question mark over the individuals inducted – are they being inducted because they deserve to be or because there is a quota to fill.

   Log in to Reply

2. I too think one program every year is far too many. After about 10 (or maybe less) it will become pandering and lose its grandeur.

   Log in to Reply

3. I am not entirely convinced. I do not believe that every year there will be someone deserving (and I definitely do not believe that there will be shows deserving) of this award. I wholeheartedly agree that more woman should and deserve to be conducted into the hall of fame, but I disagree with quotas (for want of a better word).

   For example, what about a year when two women are deserving of the honour, but no men?

   Log in to Reply

4. I agree with one male and one female, but don’t think there is any need to induct one show each year.

   Log in to Reply

5. Well done David for starting this debate. The ratio is really a disgrace.

   Log in to Reply

6. 1 male, 1 female and 1 program? Where have I heard that idea before… oh yes…

   http://tvtonight.com.au/2013/03/time-to-induct-peter-harvey-into-logies-hall-of-fame.html

   (scroll down the list of comments to March 3, 2013 1.02pm)

   🙂

   Log in to Reply

   1. Good one Andrew! It was time to push, even though in reality we will be too late for 2015.

      Log in to Reply