0/5

Struggle Street

The balance of a controversial SBS doco is weighted towards conflict over context.

2015-05-02_0153

It’s very obvious in the opening scenes of Struggle Street that this a documentary pitched at an international audience. Why else would it need to paint Sydney as a glamorous, beach-loving metropolis only to screech to a halt at a roadsign for Mt. Druitt?

Suddenly the tone shifts: More than 1/3 of residents live in public housing “in some areas.” Many are unemployed or on a pension in this “Boganville shithole”. With its crude montage of residents (including an unnecessary fart) you could be mistaken for thinking you were watching something from a 6:30 current affairs show. These locals look abusive, poor, angry, reckless and I really wouldn’t want them as my neighbours.

“That’s how they do it in the Druitt,” narrator David Field will tell us.

Amongst the residents we meet is Ashley, who has had 10 kids (several of whom are out of work) and 18 grandchildren. Sadly, he has endured 4 heart attacks, a stroke, a triple bypass and lives on a Disability pension. At 53 he suffers dementia and his wife, Peta serves as his carer.

Their home is an eyesore inside and out, whilst one son, Corey, has an ice addiction. Clearly at odds with parents, he is more than a handful -even allegedly taking property from his parents to sell for cash.

Later he will face a court trial for possessing drugs, whereupon his Dad concedes prison would probably be the best thing for him.

“The ice has changed him,” Ashley tells us.

“He’d be alright if he got off the drugs,” says Peta.

Another son Tristan, who has brain damage, loves his Dad but wants to punch his brother. It’s all too sad.

Other subjects include 21 year old single mother Erin, who is already doing it tough, but has taken in teen rebel Bailee after finding her from a suicide attempt. Erin is giving something back when she is sorely in need of her own support.

Bailee, who tells us she changes her postcode when applying for jobs, is at one stage heard to ask the crew, “Can we not record this please?”

Homeless Indigenous man William is dependent on welfare, and lives in the bush where he slugs birds with a slingshot for food. Seriously. William (who drops the ‘C word’ a lot) also gets no joy from Centrelink who places his call on hold to try and sort his latest problem. I suspect many will empathise with the length of time it takes.

Amid the grim narration there are occasional off-camera questions to the subjects (from a producer… cameraman?). As a storytelling device these are too random to be justified, and frankly only makes me feel like the show is being done on the cheap.

There are also subtitles for subjects speaking English that perhaps add to the divide already widening between my couch and these doco characters.

Most concerningly, there is a scene of housemates breaking into a locked bedroom because, as one is heard to say, “I want another cone.” If I didn’t feel like a voyeur before, I do now.

It’s true there are some scenes that depict more positivity: a Father’s Day bonding between Ashley and Tristan, and some social assistance for Bailee from Graceades Cottage program development worker Ivanka.

But in the first episode the balance is overwhelmingly weighted to the negative. The shock tactics are in your face: visually, tonally, and in its storytelling.

If the purpose is to shine a light on the disadvantaged why is it focussed on one suburb? And why is there so little about what government and community is doing to address homelessness, mental health and poverty? Instead of empathising with their plight, this series bombards us with arguments, despair, addiction, lawlessness.

I regret it leaves me feeling “Thank god, it’s them and not me.” Following on from recent disappointing exercises such as Living with the Enemy, SBS is at risk of raising more questions than it answers and producers putting conflict above context.

As our narrator reminds us, “That’s life on Struggle Street when the odds are stacked against you.”

Struggle Street airs 8:30pm Wednesday on SBS ONE.

14 Responses

  1. I didn’t mind Struggle Street to be honest. It provided an insight into the lives of lower-income families in Western Sydney who are struggling to make a living. We must remember that not everyone is living in prosperity and I believe Struggle Street succeeded in showcasing the lives of many struggling families.

  2. It placed character ahead of any context, perspective or facts, but is wasn’t unsympathetic. Think about how TT or ACA cover these issues.

    The fact that the Dept. Of Human Services refuses to deliver many services at Centrelink Offices now and has moved them to call centres in Tasmania and a poorly executed mobile app rollout is something probably worth more intelligent voice over “than William has to talk on the phone to head office”. And they use 1300 numbers for unemployed but 1800 numbers for pensioners. So sitting in phone queue for 20-60 minutes on a mobile will give many unemployed people phone bill they can’t pay. The staff will usually let you use landlines in the office if you are polite (they have vacant desks because of the reduction of staff)

    They have selected characters unable to compete in society for the expected reasons, single parent, disability,…

  3. After viewing this program, I have to say that I disagree strongly with this review. I found it compelling and quite poignant. The trouble with Aussie TV is that our fictional dramas are mainly about beautiful people set in funky and/or affluent locations. It’s all ooh & ash but they lack substance. Struggle Street seemed real rather than the contrived Bullshit seen in RHOM.

  4. Well done SBS !

    It’s about time we had a show that exposes the people on welfare as drug users, animal killers and unemployed dole bluggers.

  5. Here’s the thing – SBS has a complex commissioning process whereby decisions have to be signed off by many people – layers of editorial management. The end result has crossed many key decision-makers desks, and SBS must be accountable and accept responsibility, come what may. Sometimes it’s important to shine a light in dark places – but what does this add to the conversation?

  6. The trouble is that, this is how some people live their life and they probably don’t really give a sh#t what anyone else thinks. It may make for voyeuristic viewing with many cheap shots at these folk, but govt/charity/community help is unlikely to ever work for a fair number of them. When you get 2nd and 3rd generation living off govt handouts, it is extremely hard to break the cycle, it still has to be tried but is largely futile…….excuse my ignorance, but what is the cone reference about?

          1. And here was me wondering why anyone would keep their ice cream in a locked bedroom :/

  7. Of course the real ACA jumped on the bandwagon last night – only this time they were ‘on the family’s side’ – yet they also showed the infamous fart scene. So Frontline.

Leave a Reply