0/5

Deal wins first round

Deal wins against Hot Seat without even taking a hit. But Nine improves its 5:30 audience and a lift to News.

deal-no-deal1Deal or No Deal has won the first round in the 5:30pm battle.

Deal took home 776,000 viewers in 5 cities.

Adjusted for its 5pm airing in Brisbane, Hot Seat had 612,000.

In the sheer 5:30pm figures across both networks, Seven still won the day with 776,000 while Nine (including Extra in Brisbane) had 699,000.

Seven also won the 6pm News in each city with 1.65m to Nine’s 1.29m. The race was closest in Melbourne and Hot Seat only won in Eddie McGuire’s home city. Comparatively, Nine picked up about another 100,000 viewers to its News services with the lead in.

Hot Seat picked up around 200,000 for than Antiques Roadshow averages, a good positive indicator for the network. Deal‘s figure remained untouched by the stoush.

Despite Underbelly dropping to 1.8m, Nine still won Monday with a huge 8% lead over Seven and now has two out of two nights won this week.

UPDATED: Beating both game shows was TEN News, including from 5:30 – 6, which had 1.02m viewers.

Week 17.

28 Responses

  1. we enjoy Andrew O’Keefe he is wonderful and enjoyable to watch . deal or no deal the best show to watch and 7news thanks we would love to come on the show sydney viewers

  2. Oh well, back to Deal or No Deal . Just put Eddie out to pasture he has not the Charisma of Andrew and deal is more entertaining. Bye bye Ed,you and the show ain’t got what it takes.

  3. The fact that a contestant sitting there doing nothing through the whole show that only comes in for the last question after the previous contestant passed and then walks away with all the money is wrong. The prize pool should be shared by all contestants who answeres and passed. Those who get an answer wrong forfiet their share of the prize pool. That way, you wouldn’t have contestants who don’t care is they get an answer right or wrong opting to guess for their own selfish reasons, and would make them work together as more of a team. Would be way more interesting.

    The format is so flawed, it appears little or no thought went into it. It does not make for good TV to see someone doing nothing tale all the money, and another who has answered alot of questions end up with nothing.

Leave a Reply