0/5

Today Tonight breaches Code for story on “Spreading Sharia Law.”

A Today Tonight story about a local council "spreading Sharia Law" has been found by the media watchdog to have breached the Code of Practice.

A Today Tonight story about a local council “spreading Sharia Law” has been found by the media watchdog to have breached the Code of Practice.

The story which aired in October looked at Darebin Council in northern Melbourne using Federal Government funds to advertise for an Outreach Project Officer to work with the local Muslim community. The words ‘Muslim Council’, ‘Spreading Sharia Law’ and ‘Community Crusade’ were displayed onscreen during the following introduction:

Now the Council spending ratepayers’ money to make Muslims feel more at home and to spread their faith. [Reporter] reports a public crusade has started opposing the plan and a Council, which is no stranger to controversy, when it comes to supporting its Islamic community.

The “Spreading the Word” segment by Jonathan Creek featured interviews with a group concerned with the ‘Islamification of Australia’, a local Ratepayers Association and a spokesman for the Islamic Council of Victoria.

The Australian Communications and Media Authority found that Seven breached the Code on several counts.

The first was in misrepresenting that Council was advertising for a Project Officer to work only with the peak Muslim community, when in fact the role entailed interfaith dialogue.

The second was the phrasing of the report that said, the “Council has form when it comes to implementing Sharia customs.” ACMA ruled that the word “implement” suggested the Council had a formal process for executing Sharia customs when it did not.

The third was in relation to a reference by the reporter that “no-one, including the Mayor, were prepared to speak to us.”

The producer of the show asserts they had tried many times to contact the mayor until 4pm the day of broadcast and that by the time an email had been received indicating a willingness to speak “the window of opportunity had closed.”

However ACMA says emails from the Council advised Seven at 3:13pm the mayor was willing to speak, and there are references to several follow-ups at 3.14pm, 4.21pm, 4.29pm, 5.23pm, and a phone call to the program’s chief-of-staff at 4.45pm.

ACMA ruled that Seven’s claim nobody wanted to speak to them was a breach of the Code.

This raises wider questions about what is a reasonable period for current affairs shows to wait for responses?

Seven later published a response from Mayor Diana Asmar on its website.

The ACMA report, which also removes all identities named in the report, did not advise of any punishment for the breaches.

8 Responses

  1. @ coc – Orrrrrrrrr the networks would learn not to air crap they know is false (at worst) or just guessing at (at best)…

    Now that would be an improvement in quality 🙂

  2. What better time would there be to release such a finding, as it is exactly now, given the recent turmoil…But be careful those who call ACMA toothless and ineffective….You may get what you want one day, and just for example this particular segment on today tonight would pale into insignificance when compared to what some very vested interests get away with at present…If that incentive was removed, possibly the money behind media ownership could disappear and the resultant quality of what would be aired could degenerate into community TV status entirely, instead just in the non-rating periods.

  3. ‘The ACMA report, which also removes all identities named in the report, did not advise of any punishment for the breaches…’ that’s because this was the punishment. ACMA gave a television network a bad report card… tut tut… naughty naughty… don’t do it again.

    If only authorities like ACMA had the strength to actually punish offenders with financial penalties… imagine how great Australian media would be then.

  4. Example #347 of ACMA taking far too long to report that someone did something wrong but that nothing will be done about it.
    Can someone please get rid of this antiquated and terrible “Authority” (I use quotation marks because authority is meant to mean someone with power) and replace it with a system that can actually do something worthwhile.

Leave a Reply