0/5

Parer’s War

More love story than war story, ABC's telemovie reveres a man who was a storyteller with his camera.

Damien and MArie_15477412If you’re producing a drama about the life of a cinematographer then you want to make sure your story looks handsome on the screen.

Thankfully, Parer’s War by Pericles Films ticks that box.

The recreation of the 1940s in Australia and New Guinea lives up to expectations with a rich tapestry of images and soundtrack, lovingly directed by Alister Grierson.

Matt Le Nevez (Offspring, Howzat!) portrays Damien Parer, a cinematographer working alongside Australian troops before the word “embedded” ever entered our vernacular. Parer was a passionate storyteller, risking his life to capture the footage of our boys on the frontline in an era when battle scenes were largely re-enacted for the benefit of cameras.

Parer strived for authenticity, climbing trees to get the best vantage point for the action, and hiding from the enemy for fear of getting shot.

His footage of Aussies fighting the Japanese in New Guinea comprised the film Kokoda: Frontline, produced for Ken Hall (Rob Carlton). It went on to win Australia’s first Academy Award and it changed public opinion when complacency was taking hold.

But Parer was furious when images released to newspapers threatened to give up the location of the troops to the enemy. In Parer’s War, he argues with the army bureaucrats, personified here by Nicholas Bell.

Much of the telemovie, however, revolves around his romance with girlfriend Marie Cotter (Adelaide Clemens) and his reticence to pursue marriage, in spite of his religious faith. It’s as if he is more in love with his camera than his sweetheart. Marie is frustrated by his cold feet and distance, wondering if he will ever return home alive.

In this most heroic role, Le Nevez underplays Parer the man. His performance is never flashy, leaving the conflict to primarily play out in the romance. Adelaide Clemens is excellent as Marie with a quiet and respectful portrayal of the woman juggling devotion and circumstance.

More love story than war story, Alison Niselle’s script paints a nearly flawless portrait of Parer (his passion for work is his sole Achilles heel) and captures a nation at war with identity. However the dialogue is peppered with a few too many colloquial idioms, perhaps with an overseas audience in mind.

I would also liked to have seen this broadcast on ANZAC eve or day for an ABC audience, rather than try to compete with the Logies and Downton Abbey (the latter is particularly the same audience).

However things pan out, I suspect Matt Le Nevez will have plenty to smile about come Sunday.

Parer’s War airs 8:30pm Sunday on ABC1.

4 Responses

  1. Parer deserved way better. Weak story structure, limp romance, clunky dialogue and especially uninspired direction. Every second shot was another low-budget period cliche… cue the four extras in period costume crossing from opposite directions, passing the two period cars parked on the street, etc. The Sullivans did it with more flair on a soap budget.

  2. An opportunity lost here. Some of the poorest direction I’ve seen in Australian drama for years, the two leads were miscast with not a shred of attraction between them and the edit was languid and dull. Shame because Parer’s story is a great one and the budget for this reported at 4.5 million was huge for an Aussie telemovie.

  3. Crikey cobber, the dialogue was a bit over the top.

    Man-o-man this was a flacid telemovie. Scene after scene after scene of Guys In Small Rooms Talking About Boring Stuff. It picked up in the second half, but boring the audience to death is not the way to start a movie.

    The whole story seemed to be about Parer’s battles with bureaucracy. And the romantic subplot put the brakes on things.

    It takes a lot of effort to make a war movie that makes you fall asleep. There was no tension or any variation to the pace, which gave it a join-the-dots plodding effect. I know it’s “only” a telemovie, but it wouldn’t hurt to put a bit of oomph into things.

  4. I think Matt underplays everything. He is not a flashy actor, nor an especially intense one. He was great in The Society Murders; a surprising Logie win, but when i watched him in Offspring, his energy and style were (thankfully) a contrast to Asher, Kat, Lachy etc.
    I will be curious to see how his career develops from here. I think he will be Logie rewarded this weekend.

Leave a Reply