0/5

Penny Wong to debate gay marriage on Insight

Next week Insight will host a debate on same-sex marriage with political, religious and community leaders.

2013-08-09_1030Next week Insight will host a debate on same-sex marriage with input from Labor Senator Penny Wong, religious leaders, Liberal party supporters and community members.

A strong advocate for gay marriage, Senator Wong takes on leaders from the Catholic, Jewish and Muslim faiths who argue different theological reasons for marriage to remain between a man and woman.

Wong’s stance is supported by gay couples who wish to be married in Australia and, surprisingly, an Imam who practices same sex marriages in the US, insisting that the Koran actually endorses them.

She also hears from a gay man who has the same cultural background as her – Malaysian Chinese – and is moved by his struggle for his relationship to be recognised by his family.

Insight explores the various cultural, religious and political barriers to same-sex marriage being accepted in Australia, and asks whether the new parliament will take a conscience vote on the issue, or whether it could be put to a referendum.

Guests include:

Penny Wong
Senator Penny Wong says same-sex marriage is a matter of equality. As a gay mother she says it’s “hurtful” when people say same-sex couples should not be parents. “The fact is same-sex couples already have children and denying marriage equality will not change this”. Penny Wong is the Minister for Finance and Deregulation.

Ben and Nam
Ben is Chinese Malay and has struggled to reconcile his sexuality with his Catholic faith and conservative family views. Nam is second generation Vietnamese and says he’d like to marry Ben as he thinks it would give his relationship legitimacy in the eyes of his wider family and community. But he worries about whether marrying Ben would impact negatively on his family.

Monsignor John Woods and Father Frank Brennan
Monsignor John Woods is the Acting Archbishop of Canberra. He says the Catholic definition of marriage is a union between a man and a woman with the possibility of them bearing children. Meanwhile, Father Frank Brennan, a Jesuit Catholic Priest, says although he believes marriage should be between a man and a woman, he thinks civil same-sex marriage is inevitable in a secular and democratic society.

Rabbi Jacqueline Ninio and Rabbi Moshe Gutnick
Rabbi Jacqueline Ninio performs commitment ceremonies for gay couples at the Emanuel Synagogue in Sydney and sees no reason why same sex couples shouldn’t be able to marry or have children. Her views are at odds with Rabbi Moshe Gutnick, the President of the Organisation of Rabbis of Australasia, who says the Torah prohibits homosexual sex.

Sheikh Mohamadu Saleem and Imam Daayiee Abdullah
Sheikh Mohamadu Saleem is from the Virgin Mary mosque in Melbourne. He says Islam would never permit same sex marriage. Sheikh Mohamadu’s views couldn’t be more different to those of Imam Daayiee Abdullah, who has been performing same-sex Muslim marriages in America for the past 13 years. He interprets the Koran to condone same-sex marriage.

Hosted by Jenny Brockie  Tuesday at 8.30pm on SBS ONE.

11 Responses

  1. David, according to the info on my DVR guide, this week’s Insight is about what happens to Australians who are kidnapped overseas. Can you clarify whether the marriage equality debate is definitely on this Tuesday?

  2. The day Joe Hockey said on Q&A that Penny Wong’s family was not as legitimate as his family was the day I stopped listening to the coalition for ever. I hope Penny Wong’s appearance on Insight has the same powerful impact. Penny Wong is an intelligent, classy inspiration to us all and the best possible advocate for this issue about a basic human right.

  3. I’ll admit I’m tempted to watch this. Especially as for a long time Penny Wong was constrained by her party not to say what she really thinks.

    As for The Observer Effect has SBS decided some guests are more popular than others and have decided to be mysterious on the percieved less popular? Of course that would mean not giving it away on the News. I’ll never know either way.

  4. This debate should also reflect the views of Russian and African community members. Are their views similar to their countries of origin?

  5. Pertinax, have you even watched Insight? Their studio is always made up of 50+ people & most of them have their say. If anything, Insight have too many people having their say, because they end up all taking over each other.

    Good luck Jenny Brockie keeping order on this one.

  6. What is the debate here. If same sex partners want to be married in ‘church’ – then the religious leader of that church should consent or refuse, according to their religious beliefs. If a same sex couple wants a civil marriage their should not be a problem.

  7. There are so many arguments for same-sex marriage, and Leppie’s argument is a strong one. You cannot legally discriminate against a section of the community. Apparently you can if it’s rooted in religion. Which modern day marriage isn’t, by the way. Looking forward to the debate and having discussions regarding this issue leading up to the election.

  8. When 15% of the community attends church regularly and the ALP has a primary vote in the 20s, why is the debate solely about The Leftwing of ALP v church leaders.

    What about the other 80% of the population?
    Surely they should have a say in a democracy.

  9. I don’t understand how religion can have any part in this debate? We’re a secular nation. No religion owns marriage. If atheists can get married, there’s no reason why gay people can’t.

    “Imam who practices same sex marriages in the US, insisting that the Koran actually endorses them.”

    Oh God…

Leave a Reply