0/5

Union fears “more than $100m” cuts to ABC

ABC staff petition the ABC Board to publish its restructure plan, amid fears of bigger cuts coming.

fabcAlarm bells are ringing today with union members that the Lewis Review into ABC and SBS will recommend drastic cuts to the broadcaster.

The Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance says it has been advised “by several trusted sources” that the Lewis Review is on the verge of suggesting cuts of more than $100 million year on year.

This would contrast starkly to cuts of $120 million over four years announced in the Federal Government’s budget.

It comes on the same day that ABC on air and production staff signed an open letter to the ABC board, calling on it to “take decisive action in support of the ABC” and accused it of secrecy around a major proposed restructure.

Earlier this month, Managing Director Mark Scott gave a speech to students at Queensland University of Technology that flagged structural change.

In a statement MEAA claims it has learned that the $100m figure “does not include the 1% reduction in the annual appropriation already announced in the Budget, nor the $88 million over four years the ABC will save following the axing of the Asia Pacific News Centre (APNC). This would take the total cut to more than $130 million in the next 12 months alone.”

“The cuts the Lewis Review is set to propose would decimate the ABC,” said MEAA federal secretary Christopher Warren. “MEAA believes such severe cuts would have a direct impact on vital, unique services that only the ABC can provide. We would likely see a reduction in the number of foreign bureaus and a distinct drop in the ABC’s rural and regional footprint.

“Specialist journalists and programs would all be hit hard. Areas like state politics, courts, science, law, religion, investigative reporting, trade, defence and national security would all be under the scalpel.”

An Open Letter signed by such names as Peter Cronau, Quentin Dempster, Helen Grasswill and Michael Janda said:

We the undersigned, express our grave concern at the ABC’s conduct through its secret consideration of a radical transformation of ABC operations, in a pre-emptive response to government funding cuts.

These cuts, now expected to be punitive and beyond plausible explanation as ‘efficiency savings’, will be in addition to the $120million already announced over four years (1% cut announced in the May 13 Federal Budget plus the $22million – recurrent – through the termination of the Australia Network contract).

The secrecy surrounding the ABC’s future is a breach of the ABC’s professed corporate values of honesty, fairness, independence and respect.

We take issue with the Managing Director’s vision that a future ABC will be structured and re-shaped primarily on audience demographic objectives by reallocating resources. A plan constructed in secret and imposed as a fait accompli can only be destructive.

ABC program makers are ready, willing and able to play a constructive role in shaping the ABC’s future. A future ABC must deliver quality, distinctive and specialist Australian content across the genres and all delivery platforms to sustain its relevance in the digital age. To do this the ABC Board has a duty and an obligation to engage the public whose trust in the institution, built over 82 years, has been fundamental to the ABC’s survival through any hostility.

We call on the Board to take decisive action in support of the ABC:

1. Publishing all plans, reviews and strategic papers for consideration by all stakeholders.

2. Engage in a public debate about the benefits of public broadcasting and the ABC.

3. Adopt transparency measures such as publication of ABC and executive board minutes and accept the legitimate role of the staff elected director to engage staff directly as a best practice measure in managing change.

The BBC has implemented openness and transparency measures in which executive level information is published online[1]. ABC management is failing the transparency test, a deficiency made more critical now that hundreds of committed program makers are facing the axe.

Yours sincerely,

The Staff and Supporters of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation

The public have been urged to sign a petition asking the ABC Board to publish the ABC’s restructure plan.

 

10 Responses

  1. Sorry eastwest101 no one at the ABC has a job for life and the organisation is more accountable to the Australian community than the commercial sector. Surveys regularly show that the ABC is the most trusted media organisation in the country. The ABC is required to produce an annual report to the federal parliament and its charter also requires it to produce a range of programming that is far more diverse than the commercial sector. As far as taxpayers money goes, you are probably not aware that the government gives hundreds of millions of dollars to the commercial sector annually via the licence fee rebates.

  2. I would love an unaccountable sheltered cosy job for life, to be shared by people of my own political persuasion, the trouble is, someone (taxpayers) have to pay for it all.

  3. Sugerwalls ABC 2 & 3 does show alot, but not that interesting to you. But Interesting to others.
    William – nothing to do with ALP, This group of Liberals just want to make sure no questions them. Do really want 50mins full of Ads on FTA with no programmes or making the programmes longer and boring. or No ads on ABC or just 3 mins of Ads on SBS

  4. Oh ‘sugarwalls’ what a naïve free market world you live in! Sounds like you would be perfectly happy to live in an Australia with no public broadcasting sector.
    You are obviously very happy to get your TV news and current affairs from commercial FTA and Foxtel.

  5. I will be glad if the ABC cuts jobs – start with management and journalists who are unable to be impartial. Why should tax payers money be wasted on useless/excess management and those who wish to push their own personal agenda.

    Secondly, why have multi-channels or iview when ABC1 cuts rage on Sunday morning to repeat Dr Who and show sports when ABC2 and ABC3 are showing nothing.

  6. The Draft Report containing the recommendations was leaked to Fairfax which reported much of it, forcing Turnbull to released a lot of it publically.

    Scott and SBS have rejected most of the cost savings involving them sharing buildings and back office. The Draft report conceded that most of the would increase costs for the first year or two while they were implemented with savings in later years.

    Scott has announced a “plan” to cope with increasing use of digital technology and target demographics the ABC is doing poorly in. If they don’t the ABC risks becoming irrelevant. But the final report isn’t out yet and Scott hasn’t got a plan, only an announcement in speech. So asking him to detail it now is just a stunt.

    The only thing the Government has said is Hockey announcing that he expected more cuts in future because of the efficiencies recommended. They could impose…

  7. If the ALP didn’t put the country in so much debt then I don’t it would happen in the first place and the future is to pay for content as FTA networks are no longer sustainable unless if there is sport on and quite frankly the ABC have none of it which is unsurprising, as they deserve to be merged with SBS to save money. There is honestly no need for two government funded channels

Leave a Reply