Nine agrees to stricter classifying of Dante’s Cove

An episode of US gay soap Dante’s Cove which landed Nine in trouble with the media watchdog has now resulted in enforceable action.

In May this year the Australian Communications and Media Authority ruled that episodes of the series on GO! in December 2009 were incorrectly classifed as AV. It claimed scenes of “intimate sexual behaviour” were ruled to be not discreetly simulated or implied.

Nine defended that it classified the drama as AV, a higher level than the MA classification given to the same DVD by the Classification Board, and aired it at 10:30pm, an hour later than the 9:30 watershed timeslot.

ACMA has now accepted enforceable undertakings from Nine and WIN for future broadcasts.

The network will now be required to edit or reclassify all future broadcasts of the series to comply with MA (Mature Audience) or AV (Adult Violence) classifications.

Nine has also agreed to a range of training and reporting activities to ensure that all broadcast material (other than films) that contain sex that is strong in impact now be assessed by at least two classifiers.

The undertakings are for a period of two years.

“These incorrect classifications are of concern to the ACMA as they are particularly obvious examples of breaches under the code for sex and nudity scenes, and should have been easily identified and edited by Nine’s classifiers,” said ACMA Chairman, Chris Chapman. “These undertakings are aimed at creating an improved classifications compliance culture at Nine and better oversighting at WIN, while giving the ACMA an avenue to pursue further remedial action if necessary.”

Nine’s Chief Classifier Richard Lyle told TV Tonight earlier this year, the scenes were similar to other dramas and films that had aired with male and female actors.

“The Code doesn’t say anything about the gender of the people participating in the sex scenes as it shouldn’t. It’s completely gender neutral,” he said.

“We said to them ‘You’re overweighting this and bringing, unintentionally, a kind of homophobic judgment into it …because it’s male on male sex you’re judging it differently than if it was male on female.’

“They denied it, but I can’t help but feel there is a bias whether they’re aware of it or not.”

But Chapman said in May, “The ACMA is aware of reported comments from the Nine Network that the breach decision was a result of the depiction of homosexual activity.

“The ACMA rejects this offensive suggestion that its decision portrays a homophobic approach to application of the TV Classification Guidelines.”


  1. double standards. girl on girl gets the thumbs up, so to speak.

    Bring back Dante. I wanna see that first episode again in HD on my new big screen!!!

  2. Having read the article more attentively, it is quite clear that the episode was found in breach based on criteria which are no longer part of the code. Furthermore, the fact that the Classification Board rated the DVD MA15+ means that there is no reason why future broadcasts of the show should have to be edited. Why then is ACMA demanding Nine edit future broadcasts of the show to comply with a requirement of the code that has now been deleted?

  3. If I recall correctly, the scene only breached the code because it wasn’t discreet. That requirement was removed at the start of this year to effectively bring the more restrictive free-to-air commercial television MA rating into line with the MA rating used by the ABC, SBS and the Classification Board. Then again, maybe they thought it was high in impact as well, rather than strong, meaning it would still have breached the new guidelines.

  4. I guess that explains why the story-line between Barca and Pietros was pretty much deleted in its entirety from Spartacus: Blood and Sand. I don’t think they even retained a single kiss between the two (male) characters and certainly did not retain their single sex scene.

    Given that the episode of Dante’s Cove had a higher rating than the DVD, it all seems pretty ridiculous and when scenes of torture, rape and violence aren’t “regulated” by ACMA with the same attention to detail, it certainly makes a mockery of the entire classification system.

  5. I was wondering is SBS not governed by the same classification rules? Because there have been similar scenes on Shameless and Queer as Folk, and probably other shows I’m not aware of.

  6. Put the same show in the same timeslot on SBS and rate it MA and no one would complain.

    When does the mandatory parental controls on digital receivers start again? Does that mean adults might be able to have late night TV back? (I know, I’m dreaming!)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.