Anti-siphoning at risk of bite by Tasmanian Devils
TV networks draw upon new AFL team as a reminder of pressures on anti-siphoning legislation.
- Published by David Knox
- on
- Filed under News
Free to Air networks have leveraged off the announcement of a Tasmanian AFL / AFLW club the ‘Devils’, with a timely reminder about its position on the anti-siphoning list.
Free TV CEO Bridget Fair said government funding of $300 million towards new football stadiums in Hobart and Launceston and $375 million from the Tasmanian govt would lead to public paying twice unless changes were made to anti-siphoning legislation.
“With the Devils set to join the national stage in the state’s iconic new kit it’s more important than ever that Australians are not forced to pay subscription streamers on top just to watch their favourite sporting teams play in the very stadiums they have already paid for,” she said.
“The Australian Government has new laws before Parliament that aim to keep iconic sports free, and yesterday’s announcement of the AFL’s 19th club is an important reminder of the importance of sport in the lives of all Australians. Sport is a social connector and encourages kids to be active. But while Australians have always had free access to sports like the AFL, NRL, cricket and Olympics, global streamers are now buying them up and putting them behind a paywall. We’re already seeing this with Amazon buying exclusive rights to ICC cricket tournaments including the next Cricket World Cup.
“The Government must make sure the laws safeguard free access for viewers, whether they get their free TV over the air using an aerial, or the increasing number who watch over the internet using a free streaming app like 7plus, 9Now or 10 Play.
“The bill before parliament stops subscription services like Amazon, Apple and Disney from buying exclusive terrestrial broadcast rights, but it doesn’t guarantee the availability of free coverage for the increasing number of Australians who rely on the internet for free TV. As it stands, people who watch free sport through the internet have no guarantees paid streaming services won’t buy up the rights and lock broadcasts behind paywalls.
“The Bill should require that both the free broadcast and free digital streaming rights must be acquired by a free broadcaster before the event can be acquired by a subscription provider.”
Free TV is calling for the following changes to the Bill:
Require that both the free broadcast and free digital streaming rights be acquired by a free broadcaster before the event can be acquired by a pay TV or subscription streaming provider.
Do not extend the automatic de-listing period from six to 12 months as many sporting events are acquired within this timeframe.
3 Responses
What free tv fail to mention is that the afl have used the money from the broadcast rights that have come mostly from pay tv with a bit from other fta to be able to expand and grow the competition more.
But that doesn’t suit their narrative.
Doesn’t non Vic teams get majority of their teams games Live (3 per team on 2 hour delay) with the old broadcast deal & the new one?
So wouldn’t 7Tas broadcast the Devil’s games from 2028 just like how 7Sydney, 7Brisbane, 7Perth, 7Adelaide broadcasts their respective team games
Surely the obvious solution is that the AFL builds or leases it own stadium and sell the rights as they see fit. It is the AFL’s game and rights. If you can’t trust the AFL balance the interest of players, spectators and viewers then who can you trust? Politicians?